Thursday, March 28, 2019

What You Need To Know About The Lyft IPO

&l;p&g;&l;img class=&q;dam-image getty size-large wp-image-1134383577&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/1134383577/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;640&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; Photocredit: Getty

Sharing economy unicorn Lyft has turned to the public markets for growth capital. Its initial public offering is scheduled to price next week.

As long as Lyft was a private company, Lyft investors were limited to institutional investors, qualified (wealthy) individual investors, and employees. Following the IPO, the list of potential investors will broaden to include retail investors and a range of exchange-traded funds and mutual funds with environmental, social, or governance (ESG) themes. Accordingly, a wide range of investors will be able to purchase Lyft stock, which will trade on the Nasdaq, due to its strong overall ESG profile. The IPO is already oversubscribed.

&l;strong&g;Standing On The Shoulders of Giants: SASB and GRI&l;/strong&g;

Investors seeking to apply an ESG lens can use the frameworks that sustainability standards organizations like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) have been developing since 2000 and 2011, respectively, as a starting point. For example, the SASB framework includes greenhouse gas emissions, air quality, employee health and safety, and critical incident management as material ESG factors. More broadly, applying an ESG lens entails understanding the business model, from revenue drivers to the structure of the market and from factors that could potentially impede successful operations to competitive differentiation. According to an ESG portfolio manager, in a world of consumer choice, customers typically choose value over values, but if the cost is similar, customers choose the company that they feel better about. Customers overall have reason to feel good about Lyft from an environmental and social perspective, and Lyft believes that as ridesharing becomes more mainstream, riders will increasing.

&l;strong&g;E &a;ndash; Ridesharing: Throwing&a;nbsp;A Hail Mary To Limit Climate Change?&l;/strong&g;

Broadly speaking, Lyft and other ridesharing services like UberPool represent carpooling.&a;nbsp;&l;a href=&q;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-02-28/this-is-what-peak-car-looks-like?cmpid=BBD030619_GBIZ&a;amp;utm_medium=email&a;amp;utm_source=newsletter&a;amp;utm_term=190306&a;amp;utm_campaign=goodbiz&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;Auto sales in the US are declining this year&l;/a&g; as ridesharing and other new transportation options become more common in cities, environmental concerns lead Americans to reevaluate mass car ownership, and urbanization changes cars from a necessity to an expensive inconvenience for an increasing number of Americans. 46% of Lyft riders use their personal cars less because of Lyft, and 35% do not own or lease a car. This represents progress toward sustainability.

&l;img class=&q;dam-image getty size-large wp-image-1134383577&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/1134383577/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;640&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; close up shot of block letters

Despite the environmental benefits of lower demand for automobiles, Lyft and other ride-hailing companies like Uber, have added to traffic congestion in the US&a;rsquo;s nine largest cities, according to a 2018 report authored by Bruce Schaller, former Deputy Commissioner for Traffic and Planning at the New York City Department of Transportation. The report elaborates that ride-hailing companies add 2.6 vehicle miles on the road for each mile of personal driving removed.

&l;strong&g;E - Lyft&a;rsquo;s Commitment To The Climate: More Than Hot Air&l;/strong&g;

Lyft&a;rsquo;s environmental credentials would appeal to climate-conscious consumers. Last year, Lyft established a new business unit focused on fighting climate change called Green Cities Initiative. More specifically, in April 2018, Lyft began making all Lyft rides carbon neutral by establishing a carbon offset program and became one of the top 10 purchasers of carbon credits globally. Lyft also committed to purchase enough renewable energy to power Lyft&a;rsquo;s offices, driver hubs, and electric vehicle miles.

Lyft&l;a href=&q;https://blog.lyft.com/posts/lyft-commits-to-full-carbon-neutrality-and-100-renewable-energy&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g; also partnered&l;/a&g; with public transit agencies across the US, set a goal to achieve 50% shared rides by the end of 2020, purchased the largest bike sharing platform in the US, and launched a bikes and scooters program.

&l;strong&g;S &a;ndash; $10 Billion in Supplemental Earnings&l;/strong&g;

Most Lyft drivers drive in their free time to supplement their earnings. Lyft drivers have the right to work when they choose and have earned $10 billion so far.&l;strong&g;&a;nbsp;&l;/strong&g;91% drive fewer than 20 hours per week, and Lyft provides them with access to career coaches. The part-time nature of the vast majority of Lyft drivers is representative of the broader gig economy, which provides a lot of work, but only 3.8% of jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.&l;strong&g;&a;nbsp;&l;/strong&g;Sustainable investing portfolio manager Jamie Odell expects the gig economy and benefits for gig economy workers to continue to grow in the medium term. Odell envisions the growth of autonomous driving to reverse any such gains for Lyft drivers in the long term.

&l;strong&g;S - A Labor Of Love - Employees vs. Contractors&l;/strong&g;

Lyft is disrupting the highly regulated taxi industry in part by taking regulatory risks that provide it with an advantage over taxis. For example, Lyft classifies the bulk of its drivers as independent contractors, rather than as employees, thereby saving the cost of benefits that typically come with full-time employment, such as drivers&a;rsquo; unemployment, retirement, and health insurance.

The question of whether Lyft drivers are independent contractors or employees has parallels with the question of whether FedEx drivers are independent contractors or employees. Last November, two Lyft drivers, one in Massachusetts and one in California, filed proposed class action lawsuits, alleging the company inadequately paid them and misclassified them as contractors. By classifying the bulk of its workforce as contractors, Lyft and other companies like it are saving millions of dollars per year in drivers&s; health insurance, retirement, unemployment, and other benefits that typically come with full-time employment. A good rule of thumb is that benefits cost 25% of the cost of salaries. Lyft&a;rsquo;s approach to driver classification has parallels to that of FedEx.&a;nbsp; FedEx long maintained that its drivers were independent contractors before settling in 2015 with California drivers for $228 million.

&l;strong&g;G &a;ndash; Dual Class Shares&l;/strong&g;

A group of asset managers, pensions, and unions wrote to Lyft&a;rsquo;s board to recommend against Lyft&a;rsquo;s plans for dual class shares, which involves a new share class for co-founders with 20 votes each. The &l;a href=&q;https://www.ft.com/content/7d26dca6-4747-11e9-b168-96a37d002cd3&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;investor letter&l;/a&g; called for Lyft to ideally adopt a one-share, one-vote governance structure and at a minimum include a sunset provision that phases out the extra voting rights over time to reduce the uncompensated risk that potential investors face. Lyft&a;rsquo;s response to the investor letter is pending.

&l;strong&g;Uber: Another Ride To Hail?&a;nbsp; &l;/strong&g;

There are a range of issues for an institutional investor contemplating a stake in Lyft to consider, and this article has touched on a handful. The good news for Lyft ESG analysts is that their work can be leveraged for the upcoming Uber IPO or for an investment decision on Yandex, the largest technology company in Russia and founder of Yandex Taxi. Just as today represents the early stages of the gig economy and the prevalence of autonomous driving, it also the early stages of ESG analysis on ride hailing.&l;/p&g;

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

Top 5 High Tech Stocks To Watch Right Now

tags:CAGR,KMI,LYV,PHH,ISCA,

Fiesta Restaurant Group (NASDAQ:FRGI) was downgraded by Zacks Investment Research from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note issued to investors on Thursday.

According to Zacks, “Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. owns and operates quick-casual restaurants under the Pollo Tropical(R) and Taco Cabana(R) brand names in the United States. The Company’s Pollo Tropical restaurants offer a wide selection of tropical and Caribbean inspired food. The Taco Cabana restaurants offer a wide selection of fresh Tex-Mex and traditional Mexican food. Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. is headquartered in Miami, Florida. “

Get Fiesta Restaurant Group alerts:

A number of other equities research analysts have also recently commented on the stock. BidaskClub cut shares of Fiesta Restaurant Group from a “strong-buy” rating to a “buy” rating in a report on Wednesday, August 29th. ValuEngine cut shares of Fiesta Restaurant Group from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Thursday, August 9th. Wedbush increased their price target on shares of Fiesta Restaurant Group from $29.00 to $33.00 and gave the company an “outperform” rating in a report on Monday, July 2nd. Finally, TheStreet upgraded shares of Fiesta Restaurant Group from a “d+” rating to a “c” rating in a report on Wednesday, May 9th. One research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, two have issued a hold rating and three have assigned a buy rating to the company. The stock presently has a consensus rating of “Hold” and an average price target of $25.75.

Top 5 High Tech Stocks To Watch Right Now: California Grapes International, Inc. (CAGR)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By SEEKINGALPHA.COM]

    It is hard to fully wrap your hands around the potential market opportunity that Accenture will have in the years ahead but I believe that the opportunities are almost endless (dramatic, I know). For example, consider these forecasts that Forbes detailed in its "2017 Roundup Of Internet Of Things Forecast" report:

    According to Bain, "B2B IoT segments will generate more than $300B annually by 2020, including about $85B in the industrial sector". According to PwC, "$6T will be spent on IoT solutions between 2015 and 2020". According to Accenture, "Industrial Internet Of Things could add $14.2T to the economy by 2020". According to Statista, "The global Internet of Things (IoT) market is projected to grow from $2.99T in 2014 to $8.9T in 2020, attaining a 19.92% Compound Annual Growth Rate (OTCPK:CAGR). Industrial manufacturing is predicted to increase from $472B in 2014 to $890B in global IoT spending. Healthcare and life sciences are projected to increase from $520B in 2014 to $1.335T in 2020, attaining a 17% CAGR".

    The forecasts compiled by Forbes are all over the place but one thing is consistent, that is, the growth potential for IoT (and the sub-industries) is real. Connected things are expected to experience significant growth and I believe that it is hard to deny that digital will play a key role in the future growth of the global economy.

Top 5 High Tech Stocks To Watch Right Now: Kinder Morgan, Inc.(KMI)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Matthew DiLallo]

    After years of delays, Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) finally gave up on trying to expand the Trans Mountain Pipeline in Canada, instead agreeing to hand over the pipeline and the associated expansion project to the Government of Canada. In exchange, the company, through its Canadian subsidiary Kinder Morgan Canada Limited (TSX:KML), will receive 4.5 billion Canadian dollars ($3.5 billion). Here's a look at how these companies might spend that cash hoard.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    COPYRIGHT VIOLATION WARNING: “Kinder Morgan (KMI) Reaches New 12-Month High on Insider Buying Activity” was published by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are reading this piece on another site, it was illegally stolen and republished in violation of U.S. and international trademark & copyright laws. The legal version of this piece can be viewed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4189463/kinder-morgan-kmi-reaches-new-12-month-high-on-insider-buying-activity.html.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    First Republic Investment Management Inc. raised its holdings in shares of Kinder Morgan Inc (NYSE:KMI) by 27.5% during the 2nd quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The fund owned 1,408,771 shares of the pipeline company’s stock after acquiring an additional 304,284 shares during the quarter. First Republic Investment Management Inc.’s holdings in Kinder Morgan were worth $24,893,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

  • [By Matthew DiLallo]

    Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) has invested more than $60 billion over the past two decades to build its energy infrastructure empire. About half that spending has been on acquisitions, which have enabled the company to expand its footprint and add new business lines.

  • [By Reuben Gregg Brewer]

    Moreover, ONEOK has been focusing on improving its balance sheet, getting to the point where its leverage profile is roughly similar to that of Enterprise. So, for the most part, there's no added balance sheet risk here -- something that can't be said of Kinder Morgan Inc. (NYSE:KMI), which was forced to cut its dividend not too long ago because of its heavy use of leverage. While Kinder's dividend growth prospects are higher than ONEOK's right now, which might tempt you to buy it over either Enterprise or ONEOK, you have to couch the projected hikes in history to get a real feel for why ONEOK is a better option.

Top 5 High Tech Stocks To Watch Right Now: Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.(LYV)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Max Byerly]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Live Nation Entertainment (LYV)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Nick Sciple]

    A few weeks ago, we covered the soon-to-be-public Eventbrite -- an event-planning and ticketing platform that targets all but the very largest and smallest gatherings. Who targets the very largest gatherings, then? That would be Live Nation (NYSE:LYV), which has the vast majority of market share in the mega event space.

  • [By Jeremy Bowman]

    Investors can get exposure to that growth through Live Nation Entertainment (NYSE:LYV), the Ticketmaster parent whose shares have nearly tripled over the past three years, or Eventbrite (NYSE:EB), a newly public competitor that tends to focus on smaller events, rather than working with the big venues that Ticketmaster has contracts with.

  • [By Motley Fool Staff]

    Right now, it's time for that yearly review of the ones he picked to honor the month, and also the briefly famous pregnant giraffe: five companies, and the first letters of their tickers spelled out A-P-R-I-L. They were Axon Enterprise (NASDAQ:AAXN), Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacific (NYSE:PAC), ResMed (NYSE:RMD), Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG), and Live Nation (NYSE:LYV).

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (NYSE:LYV)’s share price hit a new 52-week high during trading on Friday . The company traded as high as $49.36 and last traded at $48.57, with a volume of 2040289 shares trading hands. The stock had previously closed at $48.69.

Top 5 High Tech Stocks To Watch Right Now: PHH Corp(PHH)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    New York State Common Retirement Fund decreased its stake in shares of PHH Co. (NYSE:PHH) by 25.1% in the first quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The institutional investor owned 29,300 shares of the credit services provider’s stock after selling 9,800 shares during the quarter. New York State Common Retirement Fund’s holdings in PHH were worth $306,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    PHH (NYSE:PHH) is scheduled to be announcing its earnings results after the market closes on Tuesday, May 8th. Analysts expect the company to announce earnings of ($0.94) per share for the quarter.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Media headlines about PHH (NYSE:PHH) have been trending somewhat positive recently, Accern Sentiment reports. Accern rates the sentiment of media coverage by monitoring more than twenty million blog and news sources. Accern ranks coverage of publicly-traded companies on a scale of -1 to 1, with scores nearest to one being the most favorable. PHH earned a news impact score of 0.17 on Accern’s scale. Accern also gave news coverage about the credit services provider an impact score of 45.9794154743809 out of 100, indicating that recent media coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an impact on the company’s share price in the next few days.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    PHH (NYSE: PHH) and Orix (NYSE:IX) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Orix (NYSE: IX) and PHH (NYSE:PHH) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Top 5 High Tech Stocks To Watch Right Now: International Speedway Corporation(ISCA)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    ISCA has been the topic of several recent research reports. Zacks Investment Research downgraded International Speedway from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research report on Wednesday, December 19th. BidaskClub downgraded International Speedway from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research report on Thursday, January 10th. Finally, ValuEngine upgraded International Speedway from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report on Saturday, December 15th. Three research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating and two have assigned a hold rating to the company. International Speedway has an average rating of “Sell” and an average price target of $26.00.

    COPYRIGHT VIOLATION WARNING: “International Speedway Corp (ISCA) Shares Bought by Citigroup Inc.” was first reported by Ticker Report and is the sole property of of Ticker Report. If you are viewing this piece on another website, it was stolen and reposted in violation of US and international copyright legislation. The legal version of this piece can be accessed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4209256/international-speedway-corp-isca-shares-bought-by-citigroup-inc.html.

    International Speedway Company Profile

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on International Speedway Corp Class A (ISCA)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Motley Fool Staff]

    International Speedway Corporation (NASDAQ: ISCA)Q2 2018 Earnings Conference callJul. 05, 2018, 1:00 pm ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

  • [By Dan Caplinger]

    Wall Street moved lower on Thursday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average suffering a 201-point decline. Stocks took their cues from the bond market, where bond prices dropped sharply in response to extremely strong U.S. economic data. For years, the economic expansion has given bond investors a Goldilocks scenario, in which growth was solid but not so sharp as to cause negative side effects, such as inflation. Now, stronger signals could force the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates more aggressively than previously thought, and that could hurt the markets. Several individual companies also suffered from bad news that sent their shares lower. Mallinckrodt (NYSE:MNK), International Speedway (NASDAQ:ISCA), and LGI Homes (NASDAQ:LGIH) were among the worst performers on the day. Here's why they did so poorly.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Toronto Dominion Bank increased its position in International Speedway Corp Class A (NASDAQ:ISCA) by 94.8% in the second quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The fund owned 2,930 shares of the company’s stock after acquiring an additional 1,426 shares during the period. Toronto Dominion Bank’s holdings in International Speedway Corp Class A were worth $131,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on International Speedway Corp Class A (ISCA)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Sunday, March 24, 2019

Mellanox Technologies (MLNX) Lowered to “Buy” at BidaskClub

Mellanox Technologies (NASDAQ:MLNX) was downgraded by BidaskClub from a “strong-buy” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report issued on Wednesday.

Other equities research analysts have also recently issued reports about the stock. Jefferies Financial Group boosted their price target on shares of Mellanox Technologies from $110.00 to $130.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Monday, December 3rd. DA Davidson boosted their price target on shares of Mellanox Technologies to $124.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Monday, January 28th. Barclays cut shares of Mellanox Technologies from an “overweight” rating to an “equal weight” rating and boosted their price target for the stock from $108.00 to $125.00 in a research report on Tuesday, March 12th. Zacks Investment Research cut shares of Mellanox Technologies from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Monday, December 31st. Finally, Stifel Nicolaus cut shares of Mellanox Technologies from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating and set a $117.95 price target on the stock. in a research report on Thursday, March 14th. Seven research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, seven have assigned a buy rating and one has assigned a strong buy rating to the stock. Mellanox Technologies presently has a consensus rating of “Buy” and an average price target of $110.00.

Get Mellanox Technologies alerts:

Shares of Mellanox Technologies stock opened at $117.78 on Wednesday. Mellanox Technologies has a 52 week low of $65.68 and a 52 week high of $119.10. The stock has a market capitalization of $6.38 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 30.59, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 1.31 and a beta of 0.29.

Mellanox Technologies (NASDAQ:MLNX) last issued its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, January 30th. The semiconductor producer reported $1.42 EPS for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $1.30 by $0.12. Mellanox Technologies had a net margin of 12.33% and a return on equity of 16.53%. The firm had revenue of $290.07 million for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $284.96 million. During the same period in the previous year, the business earned $0.82 earnings per share. Mellanox Technologies’s revenue for the quarter was up 22.1% compared to the same quarter last year. On average, equities analysts anticipate that Mellanox Technologies will post 4.82 EPS for the current year.

In related news, Director Amal M. Johnson sold 5,714 shares of Mellanox Technologies stock in a transaction dated Monday, February 4th. The stock was sold at an average price of $95.49, for a total value of $545,629.86. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is available at this link. Also, Director Glenda Dorchak sold 4,576 shares of Mellanox Technologies stock in a transaction dated Friday, January 4th. The stock was sold at an average price of $85.00, for a total value of $388,960.00. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Company insiders own 4.20% of the company’s stock.

Institutional investors and hedge funds have recently modified their holdings of the stock. Private Capital Group LLC grew its stake in Mellanox Technologies by 259.4% during the 4th quarter. Private Capital Group LLC now owns 787 shares of the semiconductor producer’s stock valued at $73,000 after acquiring an additional 568 shares in the last quarter. QS Investors LLC grew its stake in Mellanox Technologies by 1,374.0% during the 4th quarter. QS Investors LLC now owns 1,813 shares of the semiconductor producer’s stock valued at $168,000 after acquiring an additional 1,690 shares in the last quarter. Tocqueville Asset Management L.P. purchased a new position in Mellanox Technologies during the 4th quarter valued at about $205,000. Dixon Hubard Feinour & Brown Inc. VA purchased a new position in Mellanox Technologies during the 4th quarter valued at about $217,000. Finally, SG Americas Securities LLC purchased a new position in Mellanox Technologies during the 4th quarter valued at about $238,000. 76.94% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.

About Mellanox Technologies

Mellanox Technologies, Ltd., a fabless semiconductor company, designs, manufactures, and sells interconnect products and solutions worldwide. Its products facilitate data transmission between servers, storage systems, communications infrastructure equipment, and other embedded systems. The company offers InfiniBand solutions, including switch and gateway integrated circuits (ICs), adapter cards, cables, modules, and software, as well as switch, gateway, and long-haul systems; Ethernet solutions, such as Ethernet switch products and Ethernet adapters for use in enterprise data center, high-performance computing, embedded environments, hyperscale, Web 2.0, and cloud data centers.

Recommended Story: Marijuana Stocks Future Looks Bright

Analyst Recommendations for Mellanox Technologies (NASDAQ:MLNX)

Saturday, March 23, 2019

This Small-Cap Alternative Energy Stock Is a “No-Brainer”

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Don't look now, but the alternative energy market has changed dramatically.

Not too long ago, the success of alternative energy was entirely dependent on staggeringly steep crude oil prices.

That and tax credits made alternative energy competitive to fossil fuels.

The higher crude prices went, the better alternative energy looked by comparison.

This dynamic played out perfectly on Wall Street, where solar stocks would track crude oil prices almost in lock step.

In early 2016, oil prices collapsed. It didn't take long for solar stocks to follow suit.

For example, First Solar Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR) traded for $70 per share in January of 2016. By the end of the year, First Solar was priced at $30 per share.

As crude recovered from those lows and peaked in the fall of 2018, shares of First Solar fought back to that $70 level.

In Q4 2018, amidst a rate hike cycle at the Federal Reserve and a strong dollar, crude prices fell below $50.

Free Book: Discover 61 ways to potentially triple or quadruple your monthly income. To learn how to claim your copy of "The Book of Crazy Big Income" at no cost, click here now…

Once again, down went First Solar.

By the end of the year, the stock had fallen approximately 40%.

But thankfully, we're finally in a place where solar stocks aren't completely dependent on the price of oil. The solar industry has matured in a way where the price of oil simply doesn't matter going forward.

In fact, as solar becomes more prevalent, demand for crude will conceivably fall. Of course, that would pressure oil prices.

The cost of producing solar energy has dropped dramatically too.

As volumes of solar energy increase, the pressure on crude will be immense.

This chart shows how solar prices have dropped dramatically in recent years, along with increased demand…

It may not matter much, but the U.S. Federal Reserve is also providing a huge tailwind to solar as well.

A dovish central bank takes the air out of the dollar. It also increases asset prices like oil.

The same cannot be said of solar.

In fact, if oil prices continue to move higher from here, the price of solar will further decline as demand for alternative energy increases.

And what happens to alternative energy stocks in that environment?

They skyrocket…

The Money Morning Stock VQScore™ system is well aware of this.

In fact, an alternative energy small-cap stock just received our highest rating, meaning it's poised for massive gains…

This Is the Best Alternative Energy Stock to Buy Today

Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…

Wednesday, March 20, 2019

Goldman says boost from tax cut 'behind us' so buy these companies that can grow on their own

Stock profits will be harder to come by in 2019 as corporations will no longer get a boost from lower corporate tax rates, according to Goldman Sachs.

David Kostin, the bank's chief U.S. equity strategist, said in a note Friday that an increase in the S&P 500's return on equity "appears unlikely" this year. Return on equity, usually abbreviated as "ROE," is a measure of profitability that is calculated by dividing net income by shareholders' equity. Kostin added the S&P 500's ROE increased by 2.37 percentage points to 18.6 percent last year, its highest level since 2000.

"Lower tax rates accounted for two thirds of the improvement in ROE but fundamentals were strong even excluding tax reform," Kostin said. "High tax rate stocks rallied in 2018. However, consensus expects corporate tax rates will actually rise in 2019, driving some of the weakness in the 2019 profitability outlook."

S&P 500 earnings grew by at least 25 percent in the first three quarters of 2018 and by more than 13 percent in the fourth quarter, FactSet data show.

The expansion was driven in large part by a massive tax bill signed by President Donald Trump in late 2017 that slashed the federal corporate tax rate to 21 percent from 35 percent. Trump signing the tax bill was widely anticipated as investors pushed the S&P 500 higher by nearly 20 percent in 2017.

However, corporate taxes are expected to rise in some sectors, especially in the communications services group which includes Netflix and Disney. This could put pressure on corporate profits in 2019, Kostin said.

Another headwind for companies this year could be rising wages, the strategist added. "Surveys suggest that wages and other costs are rising faster than companies are raising prices. Historically, this pattern has presaged declines in EBIT margins." He said S&P 500 margins should remain flat through 2020 with risks "tilted to the downside."

"The boost from lower tax rates is likely behind us," Kostin said. "We recommend investors focus on companies that are best-equipped to withstand cost pressures in 2019."

What to buy

The Goldman strategist highlighted a basket of 50 stocks he expects will have strong return on equity this year. The basket includes TripAdvisor, Cisco Systems, Cabot Oil and Under Armour. Goldman estimates return on equity for TripAdvisor and Cisco will grow by 16 percent and 40 percent, respectively. The bank also sees Cabot's ROE expanding by 35 percent and Under Armour's by 44 percent.

So far, the basket has outperformed the S&P 500 by 5 percentage points in 2019 and 72 percent of its members have also outpaced the broad index. The S&P 500 is up 12.6 percent this year through Friday's close.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Friday, March 15, 2019

Element Solutions (ESI) Cut to Hold at Zacks Investment Research

Element Solutions (NYSE:ESI) was downgraded by Zacks Investment Research from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note issued on Wednesday.

According to Zacks, “Element Solutions Inc. provides specialty chemical products and technical services. It serves consumer electronics, communication infrastructure, automobile, industrial surface finishing, consumer packaging and offshore oil production and drilling industries. Element Solutions Inc., formerly known as Platform Specialty Products, is based in West Palm Beach, United States. “

Get Element Solutions alerts:

Separately, Barclays restated an “equal weight” rating and set a $13.00 price target on shares of Element Solutions in a research report on Monday, February 11th.

ESI traded down $0.19 during trading on Wednesday, hitting $11.17. 2,657,700 shares of the company traded hands, compared to its average volume of 2,738,092. The firm has a market cap of $3.14 billion, a P/E ratio of 79.79, a PEG ratio of 4.17 and a beta of 2.58. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.55, a quick ratio of 2.00 and a current ratio of 2.19. Element Solutions has a one year low of $9.09 and a one year high of $13.54.

In related news, insider Pershing Square Capital Manage sold 40,451,506 shares of the stock in a transaction dated Monday, February 4th. The shares were sold at an average price of $11.72, for a total transaction of $474,091,650.32. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through this hyperlink. 3.80% of the stock is currently owned by corporate insiders.

About Element Solutions

Element Solutions Inc produces and sells specialty chemical products worldwide. It offers a range of specialty chemicals, such as surface and coating materials, functional conversion coatings, electronic assembly materials, water-based hydraulic control fluids, and photopolymers. The company was formerly known as Platform Specialty Products Corporation and changed its name to Element Solutions Inc in January 2019.

Recommended Story: What is the QQQ ETF?

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Element Solutions (ESI)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Thursday, March 14, 2019

MISTRAS Group Inc (MG) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source The Motley Fool.

MISTRAS Group Inc  (NYSE:MG)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallMarch 12, 2019, 9:00 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Liz, and I'll be your event manager today. We'll be accepting questions after management's prepared remarks.

One moment, please, while I pass the call over to MISTRAS Group Director of Marketing Communication.

Nestor S. Makarigakis -- Group Director, Marketing Communications

Welcome to the MISTRAS Group conference call for its fourth quarter and full-year results for 2018. My name is Nestor Makarigakis. Participating on the call for MISTRAS will be Dennis Bertolotti, the company's President and Chief Executive Officer, Ed Prajzner, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, as well as Dr. Sotirios Vahaviolos, Executive Chairman; and Jon Wolk, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.

I want to remind everyone that remarks made during this conference call will include forward looking statements. The company's actual results could differ materially from those projected. Some of those factors that can cause actual results to differ are discussed in the company's most recent annual report on Form 10-K and other reports filed with the SEC.

The discussion in this conference call will also include certain financial measures that were not prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Reconciliation of these non U.S. GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure can be found in the tables contained in yesterday's press release and in the company's related current report on Form 8-K. These reports are available at the company's website in the Investors section and on the SEC's website.

I will now turn the conference over to Dennis Bertolotti. Dennis?

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Nestor, and good morning, everyone. During today's call, we will give you an update on MISTRAS' business performance, financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2018, as well as give you our outlook for 2019.

Full-year revenues were a record, and up 6% over 2017 to $742.3 million. Revenue growth was driven by a combination of acquisitions and organic growth, which was about 1.5%, but was actually much stronger, considering we overcame the non-renewal of a large contract and divested operations.

Margin performance was even stronger, as the revenue we added organically and through acquisitions has been from more profitable operations, which is a corporate priority as we evolve our business. Adjusted EBITDA was up 15% for the year, with adjusted EBITDA margin expanding nicely from a year ago. This was driven by an expansion in gross margins, which have been steadily increasing over the course of fiscal 2018 and reached the three-year high of 28.9% in the fourth quarter.

Ed will go through the detail. We had several and frequent charges in the fourth quarter, which was a major reason adjusted EBITDA was slightly below our 2018 guidance.

While our financial performance was strong, more importantly, we made significant progress toward realizing our vision, executing on our strategy to achieve more sustainable growth, both organically as well as from acquisitions, as well as leveraging our increased revenue to grow earnings even faster. The core business is strong. We were able to grow revenues by $40 million over the course of the year despite absorbing a $30 million reduction in revenues, commencing back at the beginning of the second quarter in 2018.

I think this speaks volumes to our strong product offering and industry relationships, and clearly illustrates that our Services remain in great demand and we continue to improve our capabilities. This includes new digital initiatives that leverage technology to improve performance and quality while reducing costs. From tablets in the field to Onstream centralized data analytics facility, we are finding ways to leverage technology to provide our customers with more value and in a more rapid manner.

International is also doing very well. Aerospace is a growing market, and our aerospace business is proceeding on plan and expanding, with new parts and added volume as we deploy new capital expenditures. We also expect to see a pickup from West Penn volumes in the US market.

Products and Systems revenues were also up for the year, again despite the loss of revenues arising from the disposition of an underperforming product line in 2018. Since acquisitions are an integral part of our growth strategy, I wanted to provide some insight as to the success we have achieved with two of the company's largest ever acquisitions.

West Penn was a strong contributor to fiscal 2018 success. Their non-destructive testing capabilities are unsurpassed, and they are a partner to many companies in the aerospace industry that rely upon them for the valuable service they offer. This enables them to generate margins higher than that of field operations.

Growth in the aerospace market is one of our corporate objectives, and the outlook for the industry continues to be strong, which we expect will benefit West Penn in 2019 and beyond. Onstream has only been part of the MISTRAS family for three months. However, it is already clear that this is going to be a strong pillar of our overall growth strategy.

Onstream provides a number of benefits that leverage our competitive advantages and core competencies, while offering complementary capabilities that will facilitate rapid expansion into adjacent markets. Their strong presence in in-line inspection provides a strong foundation within the midstream oil and gas market, which is significantly less volatile than our traditional base.

As one example, at a recent tradeshow, the MISTRAS Onstream team generated a significant number of new business opportunities through introductions of our in-line inspection capabilities to existing midstream MISTRAS customers. Our most recent acquisition Onstream is also expanding their capabilities, and is now in the process of taking orders using their new 16-inch tool. We are also commencing commercialization of their 20-inch tool, with their larger 24-inch tool expected to be ready later in the year.

The addition of three new inspectable pipe diameters means our addressable market will have been dramatically increased. Perhaps, the most exciting aspect of the Onstream acquisition is their innovative application of advanced digital technology. This fits hand in glove with our vision for the NDT industry, which we see evolving from its traditional roots in inspecting and reporting, to its role as a strategic activity for anticipating and predicting asset risk.

This is a key element of our MISTRAS digital solution as well, as we've been mentioning over the past year. We'll have more to share regarding our specific ongoing pilots over the next few quarters. Onstream is well down the digital road and is already able to digitally send data from the field to their central lab in Calgary for reporting and analysis.

Our Plant Condition Management Software, or PCMS, is undertaking similar technology applications. This is what the industry wants and this is where we are headed, is being driven not only by a recognition of how this technology can reduce costs over the long term and also by increasing regulation that is consistently raising asset integrity standards.

Getting better information and faster, that can help predict when and to what degree an asset may be at risk is an attractive value proposition. We already have a solid foundation and over the next several years, you'll see us continue to enhance and expand this capability across the many vertical industries we serve. This will be a much faster-growing market, and MISTRAS intends to be at the forefront of this evolution.

With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Ed for a detailed review of the financials.

Edward J. Prajzner -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Thank you, Dennis. It was a very good operational year for MISTRAS Group, as the various initiatives and programs implemented over the year resulted in record revenues and significant margin expansion across all segments.

Looking first at results for the year. On a consolidated basis, revenues were up 6% to a record $742 million, driven by a similar 6% revenue increase in our largest segment, Services, which comprises 77% of our total 2018 revenue. More broadly, the increase was due to both, acquisitions and organic growth, which was up approximately 1.5%, more than earning back the $30 million of revenue losses Dennis mentioned.

Consolidated gross profit for the full year was $208 million, about 11% higher than the prior year. Consolidated gross margin for the full year was 28%, compared with 26.8% in the prior year, an increase of 120 basis points. Reflecting the broad-based improvement across the company, for the year, all three segments expanded their gross margin and grew their gross profits.

Margin expansion reflects a more favorable service and product mix, which in turn reflects a more disciplined growth strategy, selective pruning of underperforming operations and contracts, and an acquisition strategy focused on higher-margin businesses.

Adjusted EBITDA was up 15% for the full year to $73.5 million, with all of our segments again generating a year-on-year increase. As Dennis mentioned, we did have a number of infrequently occurring items during the fourth quarter, particularly in late December, which reduced adjusted EBITDA by approximately $2.5 million. This included operating items, such as an earlier than anticipated completion of a turnaround and an unexpected weather-related slowdown, as well as non-operating item such as Onstream-related financing costs and other legal and statutory expenses.

The company generated $41.7 million of cash flows from operating activities and $20.5 million of free cash flow for the full-year 2018. As anticipated, we had a strong improvement in cash flows in the fourth quarter relative to the first nine months of 2018, with $17.5 million of cash from operations and $12.1 million of free cash flow generated during the fourth quarter of 2018. This positive trend has continued into the beginning of 2019, driven by working capital reductions. We foresee continued improvement throughout 2019.

Looking at the fourth quarter, we finished the year strong. Although revenues were somewhat lower than a year ago, we were comping against Services strong year ago quarter. More importantly, gross margins expanded to 28.9%, the highest quarterly margin in three years.

Looking more closely at our segments. Services revenue decreased by 4% in the fourth quarter. This was primarily due to Services comparing against a very strong year ago quarter, wherein customers were completing deferred maintenance. For the year, revenues increased by $31 million or 6%, attributable to acquisition as well as modest organic growth.

If you consider this, $30 million of revenue growth was accomplished after essentially backfilling $30 million of revenue from a contract that had been part of our underlying revenues in 2017. You can see why we believe Services had a very strong year and remains one of the industry's premier providers.

Services segment turned in a gross profit margin of 27.4% for the quarter and 26.4% for the year, improvements of 90 basis points and 80 basis points, respectively, compared to the same period a year ago.

Margin expansion is a key corporate strategy, and we are pleased to see margins continue to expand, driven by pruning lower-margin operations and growing higher-margin operations, including acquisitions such as West Penn and Onstream.

International revenues in the fourth quarter were down 2% from a year ago, although up in local currency. For the year, revenue increased 6%, and was due to the combination of organic growth and a favorable foreign exchange translation.

For the quarter, International reported a 30.1% gross margin, which is up 570 basis points from a year ago and a full-year gross margin of 29.6%, an increase of 260 basis points. This improvement is attributable to better manpower utilization, improved sales mix and growth in aerospace. As mentioned last quarter, the winding down of the German staff-leasing business will present a headwind to International and fiscal 2019.

Products and Systems revenues were down slightly in the fourth quarter, but were up modestly for the year, despite this segment having divested a product line earlier in 2018. Products and Systems gross margins came in at 46.5% for the fourth quarter and 45.1% for the year, improvements of 750 basis points and 300 basis points, respectively.

SG&A as a percentage of revenue was approximately 24.4% in the fourth quarter of 2018 and 21.1% in the fourth quarter of 2017. There were a number of infrequent charges booked in the fourth quarter, as well as a deliberate increase in our sales and marketing investment as a strategy to accelerate growth. For the year, SG&A was 22.4% of revenues compared to 21.8% in fiscal 2017.

Outside of some nominal growth in sales and marketing, as well as an increased investment in research and development, we expect any increase in overheading (ph) to generally fall below the rate of revenue growth in fiscal 2019. Operating income was $2.5 million for the fourth quarter of 2018, and $22.2 million for the full-year 2018. Non-GAAP operating income was $5.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2018 and $31.7 million for the full-year 2018.

GAAP net loss was $1.1 million, or $0.04 loss per diluted share for the fourth quarter of 2018, compared to GAAP net income of $900,000 or $0.03 per diluted share in the prior year. The loss in the current year quarter was largely due to an exceptionally high income tax rate attributable to primarily adverse items related to the Tax Reform Act of 2017.

For the year, we reported GAAP net income of $6.8 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, whereas we had a GAAP net loss in fiscal 2017 of $2.2 million or $0.08 per diluted share, primarily due to a $16 million impairment charge recognized in fiscal 2017.

On a non-GAAP basis, we had $16.1 million of net income, or $0.55 per diluted share for full-year 2018, compared to $12.7 million, or $0.43 per diluted share in the prior year period. This represents a 26.8% and 27.9% increase, respectively, in these metrics for full-year 2018 over 2017.

The company generated $41.7 million of cash flows from operating activities and $20.5 million of free cash flow for full-year 2018. For fiscal 2017, we had a positive $8 million in operating cash flow from a reduction in working capital, whereas this year, the change in working capital was a negative $9 million to cash flow.

As anticipated during our third quarter conference call, working capital did improve and was a meaningful reason cash flows from operating activities was a very strong $17.5 million for the fourth quarter 2018. We still have room for further improvement, which we expect to see throughout 2019.

The New Year is, in fact, off to a good start, with strong cash flow so far during the first quarter of 2019. Interest expense for the quarter rose to $2.4 million. Based on the debt added with the Onstream acquisition, offset by repayments we anticipate in 2019, we believe total interest expense for fiscal 2019 should be in the range of $12 million to $14 million. We closed out 2018 with $25.5 million of cash on hand compared to $27.5 million at the end of last year.

The company's net debt, defined as total debt, less cash and cash equivalence, was $265.2 million at December 31, 2018, compared with $139.3 million at December 31, 2017. This increase in net debt was primarily attributable to the Onstream acquisition, which closed during the fourth quarter of 2018.

Given our cash flow, annual cash interest expense and net debt, we believe our balance sheet is strong and will support the funding of both our organic and any acquisition growth objectives. Income tax expense was exceptionally high in 2018 due to a number of factors, the primary one being certain adverse impacts of the Tax Reform Act of 2017, which drove the rate year-to-date up to slightly over 50%. For 2019, we expect the effective tax rate to be in the range of 32% to 35%.

And with that, I will now turn the call back over to Dennis.

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Ed. I will conclude with our preliminary outlook and guidance for 2019. Our North American oil and gas customers suggest that their spending in 2019 will improve over 2018. And I'm optimistic about our growing aerospace and complementary mechanical services business, and excited about our growth plans to expand further into the midstream segment by leveraging our industry experience and technological know-how.

Given the opportunities ahead, we expect to more than compensate for the known challenges and foresee on a full-year basis for 2019 an outlook with total revenues expected to be between $765 million to $785 million, adjusted EBITDA expected to be between $90 million and $93 million. Capital expenditures are expected to be up to $25 million and free cash flow expected to be between $42 million to $45 million.

Please keep in mind that our progress in year-over-year comparable won't, however, be linear throughout 2019, because of the first quarter of 2019 lapping a year ago quarter, that included more than $10 million of Services revenue from the large former customer site. And beginning late in the first quarter of 2019, we commenced the exiting of the staff-leasing business in Germany, representing a further reduction of approximately $13 million in revenue in full-year 2019.

We are nevertheless confident that we can essentially offset the earnings effect of the revenue decreases through continuing margin expansion, particularly in our Services segment, as we have demonstrated throughout 2018.

We stated at the beginning of last year in our guidance outlook for 2018 that we would offset the annualized revenue loss of $40 million that anniversaries in a few short weeks, and have net organic revenue growth for full-year 2018. I'm proud to say that we achieved and actually exceeded that goal. On the whole and over the longer term, we believe macro level economic drivers will remain positive and we are confident in maintaining our forward momentum.

We will now take your questions. Operator, please open the phone lines.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from the line of Edward Marshall with Sidoti & Company. Your line is now open.

Edward Marshall -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Good morning, guys. How are you?

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Great. Thanks, Ed.

Edward Marshall -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

So, I wanted to ask about what the assumptions are for revenue, looking at, I guess, there is a lot rolling off, some acquisitions coming in. So, if you can kind of give us a sense as to the organic growth rate of revenue baked into your 2019 guidance, I'd appreciate that.

Edward J. Prajzner -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Hi, Ed. It's Ed here. Yeah, there is some, if you pull off the last quarter of the troubled region and then the German staff leasing, that's about $24 million. We had that small product segment divestment as well of $3 million in the year. So if you kind of normalize that and then add in Onstream, you're looking at, our outlook has a range of maybe 2% to -- up to 4%, 5% kind of organic growth, kind of assumed in there.

Edward Marshall -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Okay. Okay. So the next question is, I think you mentioned in your prepared remarks about SG&A and in the particular quarter, I mean, it was heavier than the rate for the majority of the year. What happened in Q4 and then what's the anticipation for 2019, if you can elaborate a little bit more?

Edward J. Prajzner -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Sure. Yeah, that did go up sequentially. We were about $42 million in Q3, $44 million in Q4. As we mentioned, there was a number of infrequent items there. About a $1.5 million of that in Q4, there was -- they are not recurring. There was some non-capitalized financing costs, couple of statutory charges and some bad debt expense. We recorded about $1.5 million.

If you took that out, you could -- if you add about $42.5 million, that's a pretty good number to annualize, maybe $43 million a quarter into next year. That's pretty close to our year-to-date. Our year-to-date is 22.5%. So, that's not a bad percentage to be thinking about for '19.

Edward Marshall -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

And thinking about the one stream (sic) (Onstream), were the intangibles at all in the Q4 number? I don't think it would be, maybe a couple weeks of.

Edward J. Prajzner -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Very little. Maybe just the two weeks post the acquisition. So, there was very little activity in the P&L for '18 relative to Onstream.

Edward Marshall -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

So, are you planning to materially bring other SG&A costs down to absorb some of those intangibles that might roll through on SG&A as I start to think about next year?

Edward J. Prajzner -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

This is not so much a cost-out synergy type of acquisition that their SG&A will be additive to ours, but obviously, we're always looking to ratchet down costs and minimize the footprint. But there -- we think of their amortization clearly as being additive.

Edward Marshall -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Got it. And what are you seeing from a wage inflation as the industry improves? I mean, how's wages look out as -- how are you being able to pass those wages off to customers, et cetera, through price increases?

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. Dennis here. It's still more regional than it is across the board. But we haven't seen any pushback from customers not willing to accept increases because the industry is actually getting pretty heavy in '19 or later half of '19. Stream is probably going to be a little bit lighter than you would see typically. It's going to be about an average spring, but we think the fall is going to be heavier.

So, customers know that there's a lot of regional fighting for labor and skilled labor size. So, they are willing to talk to us about doing a pass through on these things now that -- what they're going to do is they're going to allow it to be pass through and be pass through for the labor in Gulf Coast, west, many regions where they're getting tight.

Edward Marshall -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Last, I want to follow up on the -- last statement about the spring versus the fall. Is that an anticipation of back ending their CapEx or their spend, their maintenance spend to the back half of the year to make sure that they did kind of get a wait and see throughout the year or is it just timing? Is it -- any comments that you could add to that statement about the average spring versus a heavier falling would be helpful?

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I guess, comparatively, when you look at last year, I think there was a lot of catch-up activity going on, more so than this is a wider spring. It does seem to be a little bit later in the year. It does seem like it is happening more in late February and March and April. Sometimes in the year, there's a lot of activity, January, February, we're not seeing that as much. So, I don't know if that's a capital planning or it's just the way the projects are rolling out.

Edward Marshall -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Got it. Thanks very much for your comments. I appreciate it.

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes.

Operator

Our next question comes the line of Tahira Afzal with KeyBanc. Your line is now open.

Tahira Afzal -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Hi, Dennis and Ed. Hope you are well.

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Morning.

Tahira Afzal -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Morning. So folks, as you look at Onstream and you talked a lot about the addressable market and as you bring in the wider pipe to that market, TAM is essentially going up. So, can you kind of talk about how much that addressable market is going up by, as you bring in the new tools? Is it like doubling in size over the next five years or am I being too optimistic?

Jonathan H. Wolk -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Hi, Tahira. It's Jon. I'll take that one. So, we have sized. We've been -- people helped us size the North American in-line inspection opportunity at roughly $0.75 billion per year. And Onstream, at the time of acquisition, probably addresses about, let's say, up to about 30% to 40% of that market and at the time of acquisition. And we believe that with the tools that Onstream is introducing to the market both in 2019, as well as on the drawing board over the next couple of years that will be able to address at least two-thirds of that market size.

Tahira Afzal -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Okay.

Jonathan H. Wolk -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

And we expect the market to grow as well.

Tahira Afzal -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

So, I mean, is it conceivable between this tool and your traditional business because there has been potentially some pent-up spending likely? It seems like even yourself (ph) were a little more conservative, are optimistic about the oil and gas customers picking up spending. Is it conceivable organically, we could see growth in the high single-digits for that business from a two-year to three-year perspective?

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, Tahira. We're certainly playing on that. Our underwriting thesis was certainly that we believe Onstream will grow organically, at least in the high single-digits per year.

Tahira Afzal -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Got it. Okay. And then just in terms of margins. Obviously, you're going to be very specialized in that business. As you cover that with a more traditional business, is there a marginal pricing opportunities for yourself?

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

I think there is a marginal price opportunity in there because Onstream is a terrific service provider, delivers reports to customers much sooner than at the industry standard. It is pretty nimble in terms of organizing to suit client needs and so forth, and tends to be value priced to an extent. So, there is a pricing opportunity that is implied in there, yes.

Tahira Afzal -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Got it. Okay. And then just wanted to circle back on Safran. Clearly, there is Boeing been in the news with the 737 Max. I know Safran has some exposure there. Is this potentially a positive development for yourselves or will there be more testing in fuselage integrity needs are -- do you see this as net neutral to your business ?

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Tahira, it's Dennis. I mean, I think it's very early from what we see, this might be more of a safety device or something other than an aerospace propulsion issue. Certainly if it became something what I've seen and engine component fail or some critical structure be part of the scenario, then absolutely more testing would be involved. Right now, it's too early to say.

I will say -- so, I mean, we're not sure on that. I will say one thing. I mean, we picked the aerospace, mechanical and pipeline markets for our growth in the near future and we see all three really still performing well. So, West Penn, Safran, and all of our aerospace growth we see as being good. Onstream fits inside the pipeline and even mechanical blowing over. So the three that's been our pillars, we still see as being very, very aggressive in the next couple of years and a chance for us to really maybe outperform a lot of what you would think in normal oil and gas or other aerospace markets, right?

Tahira Afzal -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Okay. That's actually good to hear. Last question for me, Dennis. One of your peers has already started talking a bit more about taking some of the inspection tools and technologies, and applying them to the upstream space of oil and gas. And it's an area you guys doubled in. Seems from all the customer calls that I've been listening to, that's a great opportunity over there. Any thoughts about that or would you rather just digest all the initiatives that are currently in place?

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, I'm really not familiar with the one you're talking about. But what I can tell you from our point of view, we do see there is possibilities of growth for us in upstream or anywhere else in the oil and gas through our digital capabilities. We're trying to grow this digital to become a value player and find ways to save money and be more efficient.

So, I'm not sure if that's the company, if that's kind of the idea that the other company is looking at.

Tahira Afzal -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

That is.

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

But what we are looking at is more efficient we can become and give data to them quickly and smartly and something they can react on very quick in the field versus weeks or days later so much the better. So, we definitely are going down that path. Somebody else, I can't speak to but --

Tahira Afzal -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Got it, Dennis. That's actually helpful. Thank you.

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Okay. Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Chip Moore with Canaccord. Your line is now open.

Chip Moore -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst

Yeah. Morning. Thanks. Hey, guys.

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, Chip.

Chip Moore -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst

I guess, on Onstream, now that you've had them for about three months or so, can you talk about accelerating their presence in the US in the sales? How do we think about investments to help accelerate that and timing?

Jonathan H. Wolk -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Yeah. Hi, Chip. This is Jon. We are really -- and Onstream shares our excitement in the US growth that Onstream is starting to experience now. And more importantly, the potential market that's out there. Now, Onstream really has earned its reputation and grown to its present size largely on the back of a Canadian market that is about 30% the size of the total North American market.

And as we think about the applicability of Onstream in the United States, there's lots of opportunity. What we're doing is focusing and focusing on our path to make sure we don't try to boil the ocean. But we're very excited about the uptick that we're seeing and the potential that exists.

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Chip, it's Dennis. Our recent growth in PCMS and many other platforms prior to Onstream were in actually midstream. So, we have a lot of connections and customers in the US market that we always felt would be a very strategic benefit for us to help them grow in the US.

And just like, when we tried to go into Canada, it took us a while to kind of understand and know what that market is about and how to best work within it. It would take them a similar type time to understand. the US market. We have the ability to put them in every place that they need to be. Every zone that they're looking at, we have people and customers already in.

Edward J. Prajzner -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

And Chip, it's Ed. You mentioned the investment there. We have scaled up the CapEx. We've been running at $20 million last couple of years. So, we are envisioning up to maybe $25 million this year for CapEx, fairly modest in the greater scheme, but this is not going to require a major CapEx to expand into the US.

Chip Moore -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst

Got it. That's great, guys. And maybe if I flip over the balance sheet, obviously, leverage stepped up with the deal. I think you talked about more of a focus on tuck-ins. How do we think about dry powder and pay down on the debt?

Edward J. Prajzner -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Hey, Chip. It's Ed. We ended the year at proforma about a 3.5 leverage. We would at this point, use free cash flow in '19 to pay down the debt. So if we didn't do any acquisitions, you'd probably get to a 2.75 or so by the end of the year.

So, we've got more than enough capacity. The current facility allows us a 4.0 (ph) leverage, so we can do the tuck-ins as they come along. But we're really focusing on the business at hand, what's in front of us here and the tuck-ins, as we focus on them, will happen but the balance sheet is there if we need it.

Chip Moore -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst

That's great. And maybe one last one on the outlook. Given some of the headwinds you called out in Q1 and where we stand here halfway through March, can you talk a little bit more directionally on Q1 at least, revenues, would you expect those to be up year-over-year? Or anything you can do to help us calibrate that? Thanks, guys.

Edward J. Prajzner -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Well, I mean, as the outlook kind of indicated, as we talked about it on the call, you're going to see kind of a growing into back end of the year. Again, we have some of that comparable challenges in the first quarter and second quarter. So, you'll see some strength into back end of the year. But we feel very good about the outlook and our ability to achieve.

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Chip, it's Dennis. I think Q1 is going to be our struggle. I think two, three and four will probably come through with year-over-year growth. The percentages right now, I'm not so sure. I think they will build up from the second to the third as far as the growth year-over-year, but we think really Q1 is our really only struggle at this point.

Chip Moore -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst

That's great. Understood. Appreciate it. Thanks, guys.

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

You got it. Thank you.

Operator

I'm showing no further questions in queue at this time. I'd like to turn the call back to Dennis Bertolotti for closing remarks.

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

All right. Thanks, everybody. We appreciate your interest in MISTRAS. We look forward to updating you on our next call. We'd like to thank, everyone, for listening. And have a great day. Thank you.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This concludes the program and you may now disconnect. Everyone have a great day.

Duration: 35 minutes

Call participants:

Nestor S. Makarigakis -- Group Director, Marketing Communications

Dennis M. Bertolotti -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Edward J. Prajzner -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Edward Marshall -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst

Tahira Afzal -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Jonathan H. Wolk -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Chip Moore -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst

More MG analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Brokerages Anticipate Unum Group (UNM) Will Post Earnings of $1.32 Per Share

Equities research analysts expect Unum Group (NYSE:UNM) to announce earnings per share of $1.32 for the current quarter, Zacks Investment Research reports. Two analysts have issued estimates for Unum Group’s earnings, with the lowest EPS estimate coming in at $1.32 and the highest estimate coming in at $1.34. Unum Group posted earnings of $1.24 per share in the same quarter last year, which would indicate a positive year-over-year growth rate of 6.5%. The business is scheduled to report its next quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, May 7th.

On average, analysts expect that Unum Group will report full-year earnings of $5.49 per share for the current financial year, with EPS estimates ranging from $5.45 to $5.55. For the next year, analysts anticipate that the company will report earnings of $5.89 per share, with EPS estimates ranging from $5.75 to $6.00. Zacks’ EPS calculations are an average based on a survey of sell-side analysts that that provide coverage for Unum Group.

Get Unum Group alerts:

Unum Group (NYSE:UNM) last announced its quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, February 5th. The financial services provider reported $1.30 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $1.31 by ($0.01). Unum Group had a net margin of 4.51% and a return on equity of 12.69%. The company had revenue of $2.92 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $2.91 billion. During the same quarter in the prior year, the company posted $1.13 earnings per share. The firm’s revenue for the quarter was up 3.3% on a year-over-year basis.

Several analysts have recently weighed in on UNM shares. Zacks Investment Research downgraded Unum Group from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Monday, December 31st. JPMorgan Chase & Co. lowered their target price on Unum Group from $50.00 to $45.00 and set a “neutral” rating for the company in a research note on Wednesday, January 2nd. Two investment analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, eight have given a hold rating and two have assigned a buy rating to the company. Unum Group has an average rating of “Hold” and a consensus price target of $51.55.

Several hedge funds have recently modified their holdings of the company. BlackRock Inc. lifted its position in shares of Unum Group by 21.5% during the fourth quarter. BlackRock Inc. now owns 19,837,098 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $582,815,000 after purchasing an additional 3,516,140 shares during the last quarter. Donald Smith & CO. Inc. lifted its holdings in Unum Group by 4.5% in the fourth quarter. Donald Smith & CO. Inc. now owns 5,805,447 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $170,564,000 after acquiring an additional 250,095 shares during the last quarter. LSV Asset Management lifted its holdings in Unum Group by 1.4% in the fourth quarter. LSV Asset Management now owns 5,606,649 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $164,723,000 after acquiring an additional 76,984 shares during the last quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP lifted its holdings in Unum Group by 8.9% in the fourth quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP now owns 4,875,403 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $143,237,000 after acquiring an additional 396,764 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Geode Capital Management LLC lifted its holdings in Unum Group by 15.1% in the fourth quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC now owns 3,344,324 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $98,111,000 after acquiring an additional 438,390 shares during the last quarter. 89.54% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.

Shares of Unum Group stock traded up $0.10 during trading hours on Monday, hitting $36.13. 1,541,170 shares of the company’s stock traded hands, compared to its average volume of 1,837,045. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.34, a current ratio of 0.17 and a quick ratio of 0.18. The company has a market capitalization of $7.73 billion, a PE ratio of 6.95, a P/E/G ratio of 0.75 and a beta of 1.48. Unum Group has a twelve month low of $26.76 and a twelve month high of $51.33.

The business also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Friday, February 15th. Stockholders of record on Monday, January 28th were given a dividend of $0.26 per share. The ex-dividend date was Friday, January 25th. This represents a $1.04 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 2.88%. Unum Group’s payout ratio is 20.00%.

Unum Group Company Profile

Unum Group, together with its subsidiaries, provides financial protection benefit solutions in the United States, the United Kingdom, and internationally. It operates through Unum US, Unum UK, Colonial Life, and Closed Block segments. The company offers group long-term and short-term disability, group life, and accidental death and dismemberment products; supplemental and voluntary products, such as individual disability, voluntary benefits, and dental and vision products; and accident, sickness, disability, life, and cancer and critical illness products.

Featured Story: Cost of equity and a company's balance sheet

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Unum Group (UNM)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Earnings History and Estimates for Unum Group (NYSE:UNM)

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Aon PLC (AON) Position Cut by Scharf Investments LLC

Scharf Investments LLC lowered its position in shares of Aon PLC (NYSE:AON) by 5.4% during the fourth quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the SEC. The fund owned 968,071 shares of the financial services provider’s stock after selling 54,743 shares during the quarter. AON makes up approximately 5.6% of Scharf Investments LLC’s holdings, making the stock its 2nd biggest holding. Scharf Investments LLC owned approximately 0.40% of AON worth $140,719,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

A number of other hedge funds and other institutional investors have also recently made changes to their positions in AON. Icon Advisers Inc. Co. purchased a new stake in AON during the third quarter valued at $261,000. Dupont Capital Management Corp purchased a new stake in AON during the third quarter valued at $438,000. Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB publ purchased a new stake in AON during the third quarter valued at $6,587,000. O Shaughnessy Asset Management LLC increased its position in AON by 118.7% during the third quarter. O Shaughnessy Asset Management LLC now owns 55,281 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $8,501,000 after acquiring an additional 30,007 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Commonwealth Equity Services LLC increased its position in AON by 138.4% during the third quarter. Commonwealth Equity Services LLC now owns 31,915 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $4,907,000 after acquiring an additional 18,527 shares during the last quarter. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 86.24% of the company’s stock.

Get AON alerts:

A number of analysts have commented on AON shares. Zacks Investment Research cut AON from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Thursday, January 3rd. ValuEngine cut AON from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Tuesday, March 5th. Wells Fargo & Co upped their price target on AON from $165.00 to $150.00 and gave the stock a “market perform” rating in a research report on Tuesday, November 13th. Morgan Stanley upped their price target on AON from $152.00 to $167.00 and gave the stock an “equal weight” rating in a research report on Wednesday, November 14th. Finally, Compass Point started coverage on AON in a research report on Tuesday, January 15th. They issued a “buy” rating and a $195.00 price target for the company. Nine equities research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and five have assigned a buy rating to the company’s stock. The stock presently has an average rating of “Hold” and an average price target of $169.10.

AON traded up $2.14 during midday trading on Monday, reaching $164.18. The company had a trading volume of 13,915 shares, compared to its average volume of 1,295,674. The stock has a market cap of $41.29 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 20.10, a PEG ratio of 1.59 and a beta of 0.93. The company has a quick ratio of 1.41, a current ratio of 1.64 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.42. Aon PLC has a 1 year low of $134.82 and a 1 year high of $173.53.

AON (NYSE:AON) last released its quarterly earnings data on Friday, February 1st. The financial services provider reported $2.16 earnings per share for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $2.13 by $0.03. The firm had revenue of $2.77 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $2.82 billion. AON had a return on equity of 43.49% and a net margin of 10.53%. The business’s quarterly revenue was down 4.8% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same quarter in the prior year, the company posted $2.35 earnings per share. On average, equities analysts anticipate that Aon PLC will post 9.2 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.

The firm also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Friday, February 15th. Stockholders of record on Friday, February 1st were paid a $0.40 dividend. This represents a $1.60 dividend on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 0.97%. The ex-dividend date was Thursday, January 31st. AON’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is 19.61%.

In other news, insider Michael Neller sold 1,250 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, February 19th. The stock was sold at an average price of $171.66, for a total value of $214,575.00. Following the completion of the transaction, the insider now owns 5,188 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $890,572.08. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which is accessible through this hyperlink. Also, CFO Christa Davies sold 58,152 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Friday, February 15th. The stock was sold at an average price of $170.90, for a total value of $9,938,176.80. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief financial officer now directly owns 288,016 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $49,221,934.40. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. In the last ninety days, insiders sold 79,470 shares of company stock valued at $13,468,000. Corporate insiders own 0.42% of the company’s stock.

TRADEMARK VIOLATION WARNING: “Aon PLC (AON) Position Cut by Scharf Investments LLC” was originally reported by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are reading this news story on another site, it was illegally stolen and republished in violation of United States and international trademark and copyright legislation. The original version of this news story can be read at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4213630/aon-plc-aon-position-cut-by-scharf-investments-llc.html.

About AON

Aon plc provides risk management services, insurance and reinsurance brokerage, and human resource consulting and outsourcing services worldwide. The company operates through two segments, Risk Solutions and HR Solutions. The Risk Solutions segment offers retail brokerage services, including affinity products, managing general underwriting, placement, captive management services, and data and analytics; risk management solutions for property liability, general liability, professional liability, directors' and officers' liability, transaction liability, cyber liability, workers' compensation, and various healthcare products; and health and benefits consulting services comprising structuring, funding, and administering employee benefit programs.

Featured Story: How Do Mutual Funds Work?

Institutional Ownership by Quarter for AON (NYSE:AON)

Monday, March 11, 2019

This is the richest person in every state

The net worth of the world's 26 wealthiest billionaires is $1.4 trillion – the same as the combined wealth of the world's 3.8 billion poorest people, or about half of the world's population.

That staggering finding, reported earlier this year by Oxfam International, underscores the massive wealth of the world's billionaires – a scale that most people cannot fully comprehend.

As one of the world's wealthiest nations, the United States is home to a fair number of the world's wealthy elite. According to Forbes' ranking of global billionaires, 15 of the 26 wealthiest people on Earth are American.

Start the day smarter: Get USA TODAY's Daily Briefing in your box

 

CLOSE

Ever wonder where most of the rich people live? Buzz60's Mercer Morrison has the story. Buzz60, Buzz60

While most wealthy people tend to live in or near major economic centers in states with large economies, the extremely wealthy live where they please and can be found all across the country. All but six states have at least one billionaire, and all but one of those six have people with a net worth of at least $500 million.

Reviewing real-time net worth estimates from Forbes, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the wealthiest person in every state.

Credit card debt: States with the highest average balance

Unemployment rate: Jobs with the best and worst security

Alabama: Jimmy Rane

• Estimated net worth: $950 million
• Resides: Abbeville

Lumber magnate Jimmy Rane, who advertises his company Great Southern Wood Preserving by posing as his alter ego Yella Fella, recently took over as Alabama's wealthiest person. Rane, whose net worth is estimated at $950 million, continues to live in his small hometown of Abbeville and has made it a personal mission to revitalize the town.

Alaska: Jonathan Rubini and Leonard Hyde

• Estimated net worth: $310 million
• Resides: Anchorage

Jonathan Rubini and Leonard Hyde are two of Alaska's biggest names in real estate. The men share ownership of their company, JL Properties, which owns many properties in Anchorage, including the state's tallest, the ConocoPhillips Tower.

Arizona: Ernest Garcia, II

• Estimated net worth: $3.8 billion
• Resides: Tempe

Arizona's Ernest Garcia has made his fortune in the automotive business. He owns major used car retailer DriveTime Automotive and is the largest shareholder of online used car selling platform Carvana. Carvana was founded by Garcia's son as part of DriveTime before it became a separate system.

Jim Walton (Photo: walmartcorporate / Flickr)

Arkansas: Jim Walton

• Estimated net worth: $45.7 billion
• Resides: Bentonville

Jim Walton – the youngest son of Sam Walton, founder of Walmart – is one of the many heirs to the retail giant's fortune. He also has a slightly larger stake in the company than the other heirs, making him the richest person in the state. Sam lives in Bentonville, the Arkansas home of the largest company in the world by revenue.

California: Larry Ellison

• Estimated net worth: $64 billion
• Resides: Woodside

With a net worth of $64 billion, Larry Ellison is California's richest resident and one of the richest people in the world. Ellison is a cloud computing pioneer. He founded his company Oracle in 1977 and still serves as its chairman and CTO.

Colorado: Philip Anschutz

• Estimated net worth: $10.9 billion
• Resides: Denver

NEWSLETTERSGet the Managing Your Money newsletter delivered to your inboxWe're sorry, but something went wrongA collection of articles to help you manage your finances like a pro.Please try again soon, or contact Customer Service at 1-800-872-0001.Delivery: FriInvalid email addressThank you! You're almost signed up for Managing Your MoneyKeep an eye out for an email to confirm your newsletter registration.More newsletters

Philip Anschutz has become one of the wealthiest people in the world by investing in several businesses including oil, railroads, real estate, and entertainment. His Anschutz Entertainment Group owns and operates arenas and stadiums across the globe. The Denver resident has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to the University of Colorado's medical center, which was named in his honor.

Connecticut: Ray Dalio

• Estimated net worth: $18.4 billion
• Resides: Greenwich

Ray Dalio is the founder of Connecticut's Bridgewater Associates, the largest hedge fund in the world based on assets managed. Many of Connecticut's other wealthy residents owe their wealth to hedge funds, including SAC Capital head Steve Cohen, who was hit with a two-year ban from managing money after an insider trading allegation.

Delaware: Robert Gore and Elizabeth Snyder

• Estimated net worth: $750 million
• Resides: Newark & Wilmington

One of the country's least populous states, Delaware is not home to any billionaires, and brother and sister Elizabeth Snyder and Robert Gore tie as the state's wealthiest person. The two share in the Gore-Tex fortune founded by their parents. Robert, working as a chemical engineer, invented the waterproof material used in Gore-Tex apparel.

Florida: Thomas Peterffy

• Estimated net worth: $18.8 billion
• Resides: Palm Beach

Florida's wealthiest resident is Thomas Peterffy, the chairman of Interactive Brokers. Peterffy is best known for his hand in popularizing digital high-speed trading. Peterffy lives in Palm Beach, where he recently helped open a high-end, members-only medical center, one of the first of its kind. Peterffy invested $5 million in the project, a drop in the bucket of his estimated $18.8 billion net worth.

Georgia: Jim Kennedy

• Estimated net worth: $9.5 billion
• Resides: Atlanta

Georgia is home to Atlanta Billionaire Jim Kennedy, who inherited the Cox Enterprises empire. The company, which his grandfather founded in 1898, includes cable television company Cox Communications, as well as a number of other properties spanning television, newspaper, and the internet.

Pierre Omidyar (Photo: Brian Harkin / Getty Images)

Hawaii: Pierre Omidyar

• Estimated net worth: $11.9 billion
• Resides: Honolulu

The founder of auction website eBay, Pierre Omidyar, first became a billionaire in 1998 at the age of 31 when the company went public. Twenty-one years later, Omidyar has an estimated net worth of $11.9 billion. Omidyar spent several years as a youth in Hawaii, and he moved back to Honolulu in 2006. The multi-billionaire has invested millions in various business and philanthropic projects throughout the islands, focusing in areas such as local food production, renewable energy, and waste reduction.

Idaho: Frank VanderSloot

• Estimated net worth: $4.3 billion
• Resides: Idaho Falls

Idaho's richest person is Frank VanderSloot, the founder and long-time head of pharmaceutical company Melaleuca. VanderSloot has helmed the company since he started it in 1985. Melaleuca now reports annual revenue of over $2 billion.

Illinois: Ken Griffin

• Estimated net worth: $11.7 billion
• Resides: Chicago

Ken Griffin founded global investment fund Citadel in 1990. With an estimated net worth of $11.7 billion, Griffin is the richest person in Illinois and one of the 100 wealthiest people in the United States. In November 2017, the multi-billionaire also made the most expensive home purchase in Chicago's history, buying the top four floors of the No. 9 Walton building in the city's Gold Coast neighborhood for $58.5 million.

Indiana: Carl Cook

• Estimated net worth: $8.7 billion
• Resides: Bloomington

Bloomington's Carl Cook is the CEO of Cook Group, a long-time maker of medical equipment. The company specializes in devices used in minimally-invasive surgery such as stents and filters. Carl inherited control of Cook Group from his parents, William and Gayle Cook, who founded the company. With a net worth of $8.7 billion, Cook is the wealthiest person in Indiana.

Harry Stine (Photo: Courtesy of Stine Seed Company)

Iowa: Harry Stine

• Estimated net worth: $4 billion
• Resides: Adel

With an estimated net worth of $4.0 billion, Harry Stine is the wealthiest person in Iowa. Stine made his fortune in the state's substantial corn and soybean industries. The Stine Seed Company – originally founded in the 1950s by Stine's father as Stine Seed Farm – today owns hundreds of patents in soybean and corn genetics and does over $1 billion in sales annually. Stine still resides with his family in Adel, where his grandparents first moved in the late 1800s.

Kansas: Charles Koch

• Estimated net worth: $51.9 billion
• Resides: Wichita

Kansas' Charles Koch, one of the two Koch brothers, made his fortune building and running Koch Industries, which operates in everything from paper products to chemical manufacturing to oil pipelines. The Koch brothers are known for their participation in the American political system and for their financial support of conservative candidates.

Kentucky: B. Wayne Hughes

• Estimated net worth: $2.8 billion
• Resides: Lexington

B. Wayne Hughes founded Public Storage in 1972, and is today he is the wealthiest person in Kentucky with an estimated net worth of $2.8 billion. Public Storage now has more than 2,500 locations throughout the United States and is the largest self-storage brand in the country. Hughes purchased Spendthrift Farm in Lexington in 2004. The farm has raised nine Kentucky Derby champions. Hughes is also one of the top conservative political donors in the state.

Louisiana: Gayle Benson

• Estimated net worth: $2.9 billion
• Resides: New Orleans

Gayle Benson became the wealthiest person in Louisiana following the death of her husband, Tom Benson, in 2018. A legal battle with Tom's children and grandchildren, who claimed he was mentally unfit when he gave her control of his assets, was eventually settled. Gayle Benson now owns both of New Orleans' pro sports teams, the Pelicans and the Saints.

Maine: Susan Alfond

• Estimated net worth: $1.6 billion
• Resides: Scarborough

Susan Alfond is the heiress to the Alfond family fortune. Alfond's father founded the Dexter Shoe Company, which he sold to Warren Buffett for $433 million in Berkshire Hathaway stock in 1993. While the deal turned sour for Buffett when the company was besieged by cheap imports and foreign competition, the Alfonds have since made billions in appreciating Berkshire Hathaway stock. Susan Alfond shares the family fortune with her three brothers and co-inheritors, Ted, Peter, and Bill.

Maryland: Ted Lerner & family

• Estimated net worth: $5.0 billion
• Resides: Chevy Chase

Maryland's Ted Lerner has been one of the biggest names in real estate for decades, getting his start in in 1952 selling homes, and eventually moving into large-scale development. The Chevy Chase resident now has a net worth estimated at $5.0 billion. In 2006, Lerner won the bid to acquire the MLB's Washington Nationals.

Massachusetts: Abigail Johnson

• Estimated net worth: $16.4 billion
• Resides: Milton

With an estimated net worth of $16.4 billion, Abigail Johnson is the wealthiest person in Massachusetts and the fourth wealthiest woman in America. Johnson is current owner of mutual fund group Fidelity Investments. In 2014, Johnson took over as CEO of the firm – which today manages some $2.5 trillion in assets. Johnson's siblings and co-heirs to the family fortune, Elizabeth Johnson and Edward Johnson IV, are also billionaires.

Michigan: Hank & Doug Meijer

• Estimated net worth: $7 billion
• Resides: Grand Rapids

The heirs and co-chairmen of Michigan-based grocery chain Meijer, Hank and Doug Meijer, are the wealthiest people in the state. Meijer, which was founded in 1934 by the Meijers' grandfather Hendrik Meijer, has over 200 locations throughout the MidwEstimated With an estimated net worth of $7.0 billion each, the Meijer brothers beat out other wealthy Michiganians such as Quicken Loans founder Daniel Gilbert and Little Caesars co-founder Marian Ilitch for the title of wealthiest person in the state.

Minnesota: Glen Taylor

• Estimated net worth: $2.8 billion
• Resides: Mankato

Glen Taylor made his fortune by founding Taylor Corp., a printing services company. Though he no longer serves as CEO, he is still chairman. Taylor has purchased ownership stakes in several Minnesota sports teams, including the NBA's Timberwolves and the new MLS franchise Minnesota United.

Mississippi: James and Thomas Duff

• Estimated net worth: $1.2 billion
• Resides: Hattiesburg

Brothers James and Thomas Duff inherited their father's business, Southern Tire Mart, in 1983. They have since turned the business into the largest truck tire distributor in the nation, becoming billionaires in the process and the richest people in Mississippi. The brothers have since diversified their interests and now own 18 businesses, including holding company Duff Capital Investors.

Missouri: Stanley Kroenke

• Estimated net worth: $8.8 billion
• Resides: Columbia

As a real estate developer and the husband of Walmart heiress Ann Walton Kroenke, Stan Kroenke has been able to amass a large fortune from developing the plazas near surrounding many Walmart stores. Kroenke also owns a number of professional sports teams, including the Los Angeles Rams and Arsenal Football Club. With an estimated net worth of $8.8 billion, Kroenke beats out other wealthy Missourians such as Cargill heiress Pauline MacMillan Keinath and Bass Pro Shops founder John Morris as the state's richest resident.

Montana: Dennis Washington

• Estimated net worth: $6.0 billion
• Resides: Missoula

With an estimated net worth of $6.0 billion, Dennis Washington is the wealthiest person in Montana. Through Washington Companies, a company owned and started by Washington, he owns a diversified group of businesses that span several industries such as shipping, rail transport, and diamond mining. Despite living in landlocked Montana, Washington owns four boats and once spent an estimated $250 million on renovations for his yacht Attessa IV.

Warren Buffett (Photo: Paul Morigi / Getty Images)

Nebraska: Warren Buffett

• Estimated net worth: $88.1 billion
• Resides: Omaha

One of the most successful investors in history, Warren Buffett is worth an estimated $88.1 billion. The Oracle of Omaha is not only the wealthiest person in Nebraska, but also the third richest person in America. Buffett is the chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, a conglomerate that wholly owns more than 60 companies, including Geico, Duracell, and Kraft Heinz. Buffett was born in Omaha in 1930 and has lived there with his family continuously since 1956.

Nevada: Sheldon Adelson

• Estimated net worth: $36.4 billion
• Resides: Las Vegas

With an estimated net worth of $36.4 billion, Sheldon Adelson is the wealthiest person in Nevada and one of the 20 wealthiest people in America. Adelson is the founder, chairman, and CEO of Las Vegas Sands, one of the largest casino and resort companies in the world. Adelson is a major political donor, contributing more than $123 million to conservative politicians in the 2018 election cycle, more than any other U.S. citizen.

New Hampshire: Andrea Reimann-Ciardelli

• Estimated net worth: $1.1 billion
• Resides: Hanover

Andrea Reimann-Ciardelli is a descendant of Ludwig Reimann, who in 1828 joined Johann Adam Benckiser as a partner in his chemical company. Now known as JAB Holding Company, the family business has since expanded into consumer goods and today owns such major brands as Coty, Keurig, and Panera Bread. Two decades after inheriting an 11.1 percent stake in the company, Reimann-Ciardelli sold her JAB stake for approximately $1 billion in 2003.

New Jersey: John Overdeck

• Estimated net worth: $6.1 billion
• Resides: Millburn

Hedge fund manager John Overdeck is the richest person in New Jersey with a net worth of more than $6 billion. Overdeck founded Two Sigma Investments, a fund that manages more than $54 billion. The firm largely focuses on securities prices.

New Mexico: Mack C. Chase

• Estimated net worth: $700 million
• Resides: Artesia

Mack C. Chase is an oil and gas tycoon based in Artesia, New Mexico. Chase began working in the oil industry at age 14 in 1945, and started his own oil drilling business in 1968. While the Mack Energy Corporation has since expanded its operations to Texas and other parts of New Mexico, the company's headquarters remain in Artesia, where Chase grew up. Through the Chase Foundation, Chase has donated millions to Artesia's schools, students, athletic fields, health care facilities, and downtown area. Chase's contributions to the town are memorialized in a bronze statue of the multi-millionaire at the intersection of 6th and W Main St. in downtown Artesia.

New York: Michael Bloomberg

• Estimated net worth: $55.4 billion
• Resides: New York

New York is home to dozens of billionaires, including nine with at least $10 billion in net worth, and at the top of this group is investor, media mogul, and former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg. In 1981, Bloomberg started his investing media company, which also provides trading terminals to businesses and investors. Bloomberg was able to leverage his fame and wealth in the New York area to win a bid for city mayor in 2002, and he served for three terms.

North Carolina: James Goodnight

• Estimated net worth: $9.3 billion
• Resides: Cary

With an estimated net worth of $9.3 billion, James Goodnight is the wealthiest person in North Carolina and one of the 100 wealthiest people in America. Like many in the Research Triangle area, Goodnight made his fortune in the software industry. Goodnight founded analytics software firm SAS with a fellow NC State University faculty member in 1976. The company has since grown from $138,000 in annual revenue to $3.2 billion. SAS has more than 14,000 employees worldwide, and is currently the largest employer in Cary, accounting for about 6 percent of the town's total workforce.

North Dakota: Gary Tharaldson

• Estimated net worth: $900 million
• Resides: Fargo

North Dakota is home to no billionaires, but Gary Tharaldson, the Fargo-based builder and operator of hundreds of hotels across the country through Tharaldson Companies, is the closest to a 10-figure net worth of anyone in the state. Tharaldsen, now 73, continues to work at his company's offices in Fargo.

Ohio: Les Wexner & family

• Estimated net worth: $4.7 billion
• Resides: New Albany

Les Wexner is the founder and CEO of L Brands, a fashion retailer whose flagship brands include Victoria's Secret and Bath & Body Works. Wexner opened his first clothing store in the Kingsdale Shopping Center in Upper Arlington in 1963, making $473 in sales on opening day. Today L Brands sells $12.6 billion in retail goods across over 3,000 stores around the world a year. As a philanthropist, Wexner has donated millions to Ohio State University, the area's Jewish community through the Wexner Foundation, and various other Ohio non-profits.

Oklahoma: Harold Hamm & family

• Estimated net worth: $12.6 billion
• Resides: Oklahoma City

LIke a majority of billionaires in Oklahoma, Harold Hamm made his fortune in the oil and gas industry. After going to work in the oil fields as a young man, Hamm founded Continental Resources at the age of 21. Recently, Hamm and his company spearheaded the development of the Bakken oil formation, leading to the North Dakota oil boom and the creation of millions of energy jobs. While Hamm's wealth fluctuates with the price of oil, his current net worth is estimated at $12.6 billion, the most of any person in Oklahoma.

Oregon: Phil Knight & family

• Estimated net worth: $34.6 billion
• Resides: Hillsboro

Oregon's Phil Knight is the state's wealthiest resident, and has left a permanent mark on his home state. Knight, who ran track at the University of Oregon, eventually founded, with his former coach, the company that would become footwear behemoth Nike. Today Nike is one of the largest employers in Oregon. Knight is also one of the state's biggest philanthropists, having given more than $1.5 billion to the University of Oregon and Oregon Health & Science University. Knight's net worth is estimated at nearly $35 billion, nearly 14 times the net worth of the state's next wealthiest resident, Columbia Sportswear CEO Timothy Boyle.

Victoria Mars (Photo: The Russian Government / Wikimedia Commons)

Pennsylvania: Victoria Mars

• Estimated net worth: $6 billion
• Resides: Philadelphia

Victoria Mars inherited in 2016 an estimated 8 percent stake in the Mars Inc. company founded by her great-grandfather more than a century earlier. The candy company, which now owns several other food and pet food brands, has an estimated $35 billion in sales annually. Victoria is not the only heiress of the Mars fortune to rank on this list.

Rhode Island: Jonathan Nelson

• Estimated net worth: $1.8 billion
• Resides: Providence

Providence, Rhode Island resident Jonathan Nelson is the founder and CEO of Providence Equity. The company owns stakes in over 160 companies, including part of the Spanish-language channel Univision.

South Carolina: Anita Zucker

• Estimated net worth: $2.6 billion
• Resides: Charleston

Anita Zucker is CEO and chairwoman of the Charleston-based InterTech Group, a family-owned chemical manufacturing company. Zucker took over the position after her husband Jerry Zucker, who founded InterTech Group, passed away in 2008. In addition to her work, Zucker is also a noted philanthropist, giving millions of dollars to various educational causes throughout her home state of South Carolina.

South Dakota: T. Denny Sanford

• Estimated net worth: $2.6 billion
• Resides: Sioux Falls

T. Denny Sanford made much of his fortune with First Premier Bank, which offers credit cards to customers who may be too high of a risk for other banks. The bank was later acquired by United National Corporation and Sanford is now its CEO. Sanford has committed much of his immense wealth to improving the lives of children in and around South Dakota. He has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to children's hospitals and medical schools in the MidwEstimated

Tennessee: Thomas Frist, Jr. & family

• Estimated net worth: $12.7 billion
• Resides: Nashville

Thomas Frist, Jr. founded Hospital Corporation of America with his father, Thomas Frist, Sr. in 1968. Today, the company owns dozens of hospitals in the United States and the UK. HCA has paid out hundreds of millions of dollars in lawsuit settlements in the past few years. The company paid shareholders $215 million in 2011 because it failed to disclose before going public in 2011 that its hospitals performed unnecessary surgery. It will also pay a Kansas City foundation $188 million for breach of contract.

Texas: Alice Walton

• Estimated net worth: $45.6 billion
• Resides: Fort Worth

The daughter of the late Sam Walton, the founder of Walmart and Sam's Club, Alice Walton is the wealthiest person in Texas and the 12th wealthiest person in America. Unlike her brothers Rob and Jim, who reside in Arkansas near the company's headquarters, Alice Walton has not served on Walmart's board or executive team. Walton opened the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in her hometown of Bentonville, Arkansas in 2011, and the value of her personal art collection is estimated at hundreds of millions of dollars.

Utah: Gail Miller

• Estimated net worth: $1.4 billion
• Resides: Salt Lake City

Gail Miller is the head of the Larry H. Miller Group, which she started with her late husband, Larry. The group owns a wide variety of companies, including car dealerships and theater complexes. Also, Miller is the long-time owner of the state's only big sports franchise, the NBA's Utah Jazz. Miller recently placed ownership of the Jazz in the hands of a trust, to make sure the team remains in-state for the foreseeable future, but she and her family will continue to oversee operations.

Vermont: John Abele

• Estimated net worth: $630 million
• Resides: Shelburne

Though John Abele is retired, he still has a small stake in Boston Scientific, a medical device company he co-founded in 1979. Abele was once a billionaire, but he donated much of his wealth, leaving him with $630 million. Abele and his family have provided more than $100 million worth of grants to nonprofit organizations.

Virginia: Jacqueline Mars

• Estimated net worth: $24.2 billion
• Resides: The Plains

Jacqueline Mars, heiress to the candy company Mars, Inc. fortune, is not just the richest person in Virginia, but also one of the wealthiest people in the world. Mars, her brother John, and the heirs of her late brother Forrest Jr. own one-third of Mars, Inc. each. While none of the siblings are involved with the company today, Virginia was involved in its operations until 2016. She is worth an estimated $24.2 billion

Jeff Bezos (Photo: Phillip Faraone / Getty Images)

Washington: Jeff Bezos

• Estimated net worth: $135.2 billion
• Resides: Seattle

Jeff Bezos, founder and CEO of e-commerce juggernaut Amazon, passed Bill Gates late last year as the wealthiest man in the world. Bezos' empire continues to expand into new businesses. In August 2017 Amazon bought supermarket chain Whole Foods for $13.7 billion. With a current net worth of nearly $135.2 billion, which came relatively quickly for the Seattle entrepreneur, some are estimating Bezos could become the world's first trillionaire.

West Virginia: Jim Justice II

• Estimated net worth: $1.5 billion
• Resides: Lewisburg

West Virginia is the largest producer of coal east of the Mississippi River and the second largest in the country. Not surprisingly, the state's wealthiest resident, Jim Justice II, owes his fortune to coal. He inherited a coal business from his father. In 2016, Justice was elected state governor.

Wisconsin: John Menard, Jr.

• Estimated net worth: $10.9 billion
• Resides: Eau Claire

John Menard, Jr. derives his fortune from the Midwestern home improvement store bearing his name, Menard's. Menard turned down a job from IBM in 1963 to strike out on his own. The next year, he opened his first store. Menard's business has been the subject of controversy, including assault accusations from the wife of a longtime business associate. His former legal counsel also won a $1.7 million judgement for unpaid past wages.

Wyoming: John Mars

• Estimated net worth: $24.0 billion
• Resides: Jackson

John Mars and his two siblings inherited their vast fortune in 1999, when their father Forrest Mars Sr. died. Mars, Inc. makes some of the world's most recognizable candies, including M&Ms, Snickers, and Twix. The company was founded by Frank Mars, who started selling candy out of his kitchen in 1911.

24/7 Wall Street is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news and commentary. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.